Wednesday, May 11, 2016

Samsung Galaxy S7, G5 LG, HTC 10 Huawei P9 whether the Lumia 950 … – PC World

The recent launch of new flagowców recognized smartfonowym
 largest manufacturers seemed to be under the dictation of two
 parameters – the appearance / quality of workmanship and quality of the applied
 the camera. The rest of the specifications are communicated like a little
 by the way and only the margins. For me it is, of course,
 impetus to carry out the following photographic comparison,
 which this time took part: Samsung Galaxy S7
 (Check lowest price ) (12
 megapixel, f / 1.7 OIS), LG G5 (see lowest price ) (16
 megapixel, f / 1.8 OIS + 8 megapixel, f / 2.4), HTC
 10
(see lowest price ) (12
 megapixel, f / 1.8 OIS), Huawei P9 (check
  lowest price ) (12
 megapixel, f / 2.2, the lack of optical stabilization) and
  Microsoft Lumia 950 (see lowest price ) (20
 megapixel, f / 1.9 OIS).

Word
 introduction

Looking at the above mentioned parameters of new,
 smartfonowych cameras you can see a tendency to
 abandonment by their manufacturers endeavor to obtain
 images of the highest resolution
– three of
 used compared flagowców are matrices of accuracy
 “Only” 12 megapixels (Samsung, HTC and Huawei). They start a
 to seek ways to improve image quality by:
 the use of dies having a larger cells sensitized,
 constructing lighter lenses (optics Samsung has a brightness
 f / 1.7, and LG and HTC boast aperture of f / 1.8) and investment in
 optical image stabilization (here she is not only Huawei P9).

Two builders of the test smartphones boast
 in addition, that they used cameras branded optics
– Lumia has
 lens signed with the company logo Zeiss and Huawei -
 logo Leica . In the network appeared, however, voices that
 Huawei P9 optics has only been developed, and perhaps only
 certified by Leica. It is produced by the fact
 Chinese company Sunny Optical Technology . She made
 with this lightweight sensation, but in my opinion the most important
 should be the final quality of the obtained images, and not one or the other
 stamp on the housing. But if you really Leica and Huawei in ubiły
 accident lens P9 only beneficial for both sides,
 marketing transaction is still in the category of Reputation lose
 the image- will more than Leica
 Huawei.

20160422_144624xo jpg In
 smartfonowych cyfrówkach noticeable is also growing
 Fashion on the use of two lenses / modules
 photo
within the rear cyfrówki smartphone.
  Although, personally I would prefer that the manufacturer has applied
 one, the best possible class module photo, but … maybe
 I’m wrong.
from the test here two rear devices
 eyes are LG and Huawei. Both companies, however, use different assumptions
 Technical work on such a dual camera.

LG offers two cameras, each of which has a different angle
 view and the matrix. weaker, 8-megapixel module
 We use to capture ultra wide-angle shots.
 Better, 16-megapixel camera is used to make “only”
 wide-angle images with high quality.
The idea interesting,
 but the final quality of the ultra-wide-angle image turns out to be quite
 poor. They are characterized by strong geometric distortion,
 poor focus off-center subjects (in the case of a test
 Copy ugly fuzzy is roughly 1/3 of the frame on the left
 side), worse mapping high dynamic lighting and
 highly visible in the pictures electronic noise during
 Shooting in low light conditions. Below
 I present two pairs of images (with an aspect ratio of sides 16: 9 and 4: 3)
 made two cameras LG G5 in good conditions
 lighting.

Huawei set and a second camera that
 It has the ability to provide better image quality
 black and white
(uses a monochrome, and not
 color matrix) and advanced analysis depth
 frames made of color that allows you to manually set
 depth of field shots. These functions will try to more accurately
 check the way individual test Huawei P9. below you can
 However, to see examples of two pairs of images shot in
 color and black-and-white by rear cameras Huawei P9.

Assumptions test

In this comparison, the same as in previous tests this
 type, I used the smartfonowych cameras in the most
 simple and standard, or they worked in a mode
 Auto
. All photos I performed like this
 we usually do – I see an interesting theme, take out of his pocket and smartphone
 tick … Of course, the executives were photographed with due
 carefully and repeatedly, for example to avoid
 of executing the camera shake or the interception of the frame
 when unexpected but important from the standpoint of
 compare changes in lighting conditions.

I forgot it at the time of comparison, that smartfonowych cameras
 there is such a thing as raw format (RAW / DNG), which allows you to
 subsequent play in an electronic darkroom. this
 together software smartphones had me positively or
 negatively surprise the quality of images recorded in the traditional,
 amateur JPEG format.

By the way, during the test happened that
 smartphone LG G5, despite the focus is not made in series
 not a single properly clear images
. Spore problems
 operation of the system autofocus in low light shown by the
 Lumii 950 digital camera, but her case did not appear then
 confirm the correct focus. during the horizontal
 to HTC 10 can sometimes surprise us interesting
 message
(picture below), because not so difficult
 obscure finger laser range finder smartphone. However, from
 Looking at the other side of the coin, quickly and efficiently in
 All testing lighting conditions

 worked the camera … Galaxy S7.

  Screenshot_19700116-123002.jpg

Let’s see, however, finally, the effects get, snapping
 pics tested flagowcami …

Part One – perfect lighting conditions

Spring sunshine, fresh green awakening
 vegetation, blue sky seasoned with sunącymi lazily chmurkami – it
 ideal conditions to make an attractive, almost postcard
 photos. Good natural lighting of the frame and readable
 autofocus systems contrasts present in the photographed scenes
 They suggest that the cameras during operation should not encounter any
 significant problems. N Alezye therefore expect exemplary images
 exposed and the natural and attractive to the eye
 colors
.

In this section, all smartphones have worked at the highest
 resolution available. Personnel from the model LG G5 will be the only
 So were the original aspect ratio of 16: 9. Other participants
 They achieve the highest resolution, taking photos of proportions
 of 4: 3. The thumbnails in this section are for comparison
 facilitate the assessment matched to the 16: 9 format, or the frame
 LG smartphone. A full staff of 4: 3 can be seen and, if necessary
 download click on the thumbnail. On the right side of each
 miniatures presenting, as usual clipping pictures on a scale 1: 1, which
 facilitate cursory assessment of the quality of detail and the level of noise visible
 the image.

Scene 1

In this scene all the test team assessed globally seem
 to be properly exposed and very attractive
  color . But just take a closer look
 bright part of the wall in the center of the frame to note that the two (Huawei P9
 HTC and 10), and in principle even three cameras (to a lesser
 much more LG G5) too hard “wyprały” with clear details
 surface triangular gain (see clippings).
 HTC case 10 blue string is not enough, it is almost
 unreadable, it still has the … black
(a similar effect
 laundered white navy ship name happens that cyfrówce
 HTC 10 on another, unpublished picture here).

  The best in this part of the test scene coped Lumia 950,
 which additionally not naturally, but it is attractive to the eye
 podbarwiła color of the sky. With this test also came out unscathed
  Galaxy S7 – retained more color than the Lumia moderation,
 but it can not hide that the Automatic bit too much
 He tried to bring out all the details that are visible on
 photo
. For many people, but this will certainly effect
 desirable.

Stage 2

For the second time all the test team assessed globally seem
 very good. Some reservations may raise only
 color photos of Lumii 950
– this time supernatural
 raise the color of the sky still it looks good, but strongly yellowed
 Sandstone has not really.

Looking at complex objects seen in the background of the frame, you can
 the impression that the camera LG G5 can not cope well with
 their mapping – trees and buildings in the background are strange
 fuzzy
. Perhaps this is a procedure aimed at
 producing experience limited depth of field, but if so,
 in my opinion not very successful.

In general, the sharpest again is still from the Samsung Galaxy S7
 but this time to sharpen the word is too strong. It is interesting
 also that seen on the presented slice transparent
  lamp shades in case of the Galaxy S7 seem to be more
 matt gray, but not transparent, as with competitors
.

Scene 3

Third, the successful execution of all personnel in test
 devices. You can certainly argue that more is better
 intense blue, the darker the sky seen on frames of
 Lumii 950 and Samsung Galaxy S7, or is it more subtle.
 presented by LG and HTC G5 10. But these are just nuances
 that much more can przekłamywać screen smartphone, badly
 calibrated computer monitor or display more attractive
 picture electronics TV you will see
 photographs.

However, if we look at the way the reproduction of subtle
 Hedge details visible in the depths of the frame (see clippings), the
 again Samsung Galaxy S7 adheres to the principle – everything
 sharp and contrasty, while his rivals or less
 greater extent soften the texture of fine
 leaves
.



Scene 4

The fourth test scene proves that the cameras of smartphones
 indeed trudnojest surprise motive registered in
 good lighting conditions. Only Lumia 950
 a little too cool, zasinionych colors presented guarding
 Presidential Palace lion
.

If you like to keep track of the resulting picture statue nuances
 chisel strokes of the artist (see clippings showing the ear lion), the
 most try to give them cameras and Samsung Lumii.
  “Analogue” softness to the scene and trying to contrast
 HTC add 10
.

“Read also: Comparison of photographic Xperia Z3 + Lumii 1520
 and Galaxy Note 4

On the next page you’ll see pictures taken in
 difficult lighting conditions and read summary
 test.

LikeTweet

No comments:

Post a Comment