All the participants in this comparison are valued for smartphones
photographic properties.
Nokia models over the years set the standard for quality mobile
photographs. Samsung Galaxy Note 4 which some people
is the best smartphone photo last year .
New Galaxy S6 wearing immodest blades and teeth on the precipitation
Note 4 model with photographic samsungowego pedestal. Whether
It actually has a chance?
Nokia Lumia 1520 is equipped with a camera carrying pictures in
maximum resolution
20 megapixels, and so more than two models from Samsung, but
It is only available when taking photos with an aspect ratio
of 4: 3. Panoramic images (16: 9) with cyfrówki Lumii already have 16
megapixels, and so the same accuracy that can maximally
offer panoramic matrices both smartphones Samsung phones. Initially,
So chances are aligned.
Test scenes are divided into three categories – due to
lighting conditions under which they were made. In the
first comparison photos were taken in good
lighting conditions. The second part contains more difficult for
the stage apparatus, with a greater dynamic lighting
or where sunlight falls on the side, slightly towards the
lens. In the third part I present a comparison and staff
captured at night or in low light conditions.
As usual in this type of statements will try to gently
identify their own types, but I think that the attractiveness of photos is a large
largely subjective, and therefore each of the readers should
make their own assessment of the presented images and picking your own
photographic master . In the text there is a poll
enabling an indication of its winners – I myself am curious,
smartphones that falls in it the best?
Staff will be presented in three sections in each other, always in
fixed order: Galaxy S6, Galaxy Note 4 and Lumia 1520. On the right side of each frame
I placed an additional section of 300 x 300 pixels, which will facilitate the rapid
assess the quality of the image recorded by smartphones.
So time to start evaluation.
Scene 1 – interwalls
Brick Barbican and finished with colorful mosaic houses, it
scene not only attracts the attention of many photographers, but
also allows you to check the quality of reflectivity details.
In assessing the overall staff made by smart phones, it is difficult to have
important objections to any of the images. Strongly
azure sky visible in the photograph from 1520 Lumii is not too
realistic, but probably a lot of people like it. This of course
The word “washed” with color sky from both Samsung phones more
corresponds to the reality.
in terms of quality parts assessed on the entire frame
seems brylować Galaxy Note 4 . Galaxy S6 persists
He too, but on the left side of the frame there is a lot of blurring,
which we experience photographing model Galaxy Note 4. S6
falls slightly better for it in the shadows – the detail in these
areas appears to be slightly better than in the case 4. The image Note’a
registered with a Lumii 1520 is softer and clearly
weaker in the shadows. Smartphone Nokia regales us with a strong defocusing
the image on the sides of the frame – a little damage.
Scene 1 – That’s the guy from the waterworks
William Lindley constantly poses with Varsovians and tourists
at his bench not far from the Multimedia Fountain Park and, therefore,
I took advantage of his kindness. All smartphones
gave cope well with a perpetuation of the image of the creator
Warsaw waterworks – staff are properly exposed and have
natural colors. Lumia 1520, however, somewhat attractive thanks again
color of the sky, but it also reflected the worst light
gradations of blue. Also bother me in trouble again
with a focus on the edges of the frame with Nokia. Both Samsung
presents the photographic similar level, although in my opinion
Note 4 deserves a little plus in the note compared to the Galaxy
S6 – a slightly better mapping of subtle details, e.g.
Invoice lawn.
Scene 3 – In the Sacrament of
The illuminated sun, the white facade of the church of the Holy
Kazimierz standing at the New Town is always beautiful
presented against a blue sky. Tested smartphones very
coped well with the representation of the scene setting
correct exposure and, this time it was not difficult,
the appropriate white balance. Nokia for the third time improved color
heaven (this time a plus) , but reflects the image
slightly less detail and, as usual, noticeably smears sides of the frame.
Samsung goes virtually neck and neck, with a minimum overall majority
reflect the quality of the details of the Note’a 4 and
characteristic of the test piece S6 minimal
faded in the upper left corner of the photo. However, looking at
closer to detail hiding in the shadows, again, I have the
the impression that the camera S6 little deeper “sees” under these conditions
than that of Note’a 4.
Scene 4 – Remote Snooping ads parish
If you are interested in the content of the current parish announcements, this
with a modern smartphone in your hand do not even have much
closer to the array. Most of the things we learn also
when the advertising photograph such an array of just a few
m. Here are some examples.
In this scene, the in terms of readability excel both
Samsung . Personnel from the Galaxy S6 seems even slightly
more detail when it comes to the details of the wall, but in
terms of readability ads more suited to me a picture
Seen camera Note’a 4. Nokia made a correct picture, but after
Once again the sides of the frame are blurred, and readability is somewhat ad
weaker than in Korean competitors.
On the next page you will see a comparison of image quality
made in challenging lighting conditions
“See also Photographic startup – Xperia and Xperia Z3
Z3 Compact vs Nokia 808
