choice unless smartphone has never been as difficult as this year. Both Samsung Galaxy S4 and HTC One arouse strong emotions, and until we see the financial results, it is impossible to emerge a clear winner in a skirmish with the client. Let’s see how while doing unusual camera Ultrapixel, with more standard 13-megapixel sensor. Here comparison .
Samsung Galaxy S4 vs HTC One – systems
Before presenting comparative images, taken by the service androidcentral.com, let me remind you that the Samsung Galaxy S4 and HTC They have distinctly different approach to taking pictures. Samsung followed the more conventional route and increased the number of pixels to 13 million, but he said nothing of each other significantly different from the SGS3, except optics f / 2.2 inches instead of f / 2,6. HTC opted for a radical change. First of all, reduced the overall number of pixels to 4,000,000, but instead increased the size as the optics f / 2,0 is to give spectacular results in the morning. How comes out in practice? See for yourself.
For sure I’ll just add that the top images in 16:9 format were made by HTC One, and the lower 4:3 by Galaxy S4.
Comparison
Even at first glance you can see, the HTC One grabs much more in the frame, and in low light conditions gives more details.
On the other hand, the pictures in HDR came out strongly on the plus Galaxy S4. In general, they are less overexposed and more natural.
Image building is a good example of the number of pixels is important, regardless of what it says HTC. Ultrapixel captured image that clearly shows less detail. Galaxy S4 in turn has improved, though less natural colors.
photos at night is the most powerful asset HTC One, not surprisingly, comes out much better than the competitor. Korean flagship caught a decent amount of light, but overpaid is a huge amount of noise and general blur.
the macro, the winner has once again proved to be one, which captures much better colors.
far larger number of images, and in a larger size (and full of description in English) can be found in the source.
No comments:
Post a Comment